Mark and Focus analysis
Wales Moves Infrastructure Advice Into the Application Timeline
Read the analysis
Wales has set out how applicants should work with public bodies throughout significant infrastructure consenting. The guidance puts early environmental advice, unresolved issues and post-consent responsibilities into a clearer sequence, while allowing bodies to recover their costs.
Wales is asking infrastructure applicants to resolve more of their conversations with public bodies before an application reaches formal examination. Guidance published on October 16 describes when those bodies should contribute, what applicants need from them and why their involvement can continue after consent.
The useful change is procedural clarity. Environmental, transport, safety and heritage questions enter a project at different points, and an applicant can complete a consultation exercise without resolving the underlying issue. The guidance treats engagement as work that follows the application through its stages.
Early Advice Shapes the Evidence
Applicants are responsible for securing the public-body input needed to prepare a high-quality application. Before submission, that means direct engagement through statutory and discretionary advice services, alongside the formal consultation requirements. Public bodies can help identify constraints, confirm surveys and assessments, and explain the documents needed for consent.
That places practical value on asking a specific question early. A survey requirement discovered after an application is assembled may affect the evidence available to the examining authority. Establishing the scope before commissioning the work gives the applicant a clearer basis for preparation; it does not guarantee a favorable view of the eventual proposal.
Planning and Environment Decisions Wales, known as PEDW, also consults public bodies when an applicant requests an environmental-impact-assessment scoping direction. Their responses feed into that direction. Applicants can still approach a body directly where further information is needed, so a formal scoping response need not end the technical discussion.
Acceptance Changes Who Leads
Once submitted, PEDW decides whether to accept the application for determination. If accepted, PEDW usually leads further engagement on the submitted documents. Public bodies should not introduce new issues at that point without substantive reasons, and they must explain why those issues were not raised earlier.
This expectation gives early engagement a consequence. It encourages concerns to become visible while the application can still be prepared around them. It also preserves an exception for substantive later issues, rather than treating an earlier discussion as a permanent bar to relevant evidence.
Unresolved pre-application matters remain the applicant’s responsibility to discuss directly with the relevant bodies. During examination, those bodies must provide information and responses to help the examining authority. Written representations, hearings or a local inquiry may be used, depending on what remains in dispute.
Consent Does Not End Every Role
Natural Resources Wales is a statutory consultee for every significant infrastructure project application. Its separate guidance asks applicants to make early contact about environmental assessments, advice arrangements and the relationship between the Infrastructure Consent Order and other consents. Some consents may be dealt with through the order; others may require a separate route.
After an order is granted, NRW or a planning authority may discharge particular requirements or advise on an application to discharge them. This is a continuing decision role, rather than evidence that the project has already satisfied every condition needed for construction or operation.
Advice can be charged up to full cost recovery. The general guidance therefore asks applicants to discuss fees at the start, while the NRW page identifies its services as chargeable. A workable engagement plan needs to establish the advice being sought and its cost as well as the submission timetable.
For sponsors, the guidance offers a way to organize preparation around the decisions still needed: what must be assessed, which body supplies the advice and which matters survive into post-consent work. Its value will be greatest where those conversations produce usable evidence before the application is fixed.
Take-Out
Agree survey needs, consent boundaries and advice costs before submission. An accepted application still needs expert examination, and an Infrastructure Consent Order can leave public bodies with continuing responsibilities.
Questions and answers
What readers should know
- What was published?
- October 16 guidance on working with public bodies throughout Wales’s significant infrastructure consenting process.
- Who prepares the application evidence?
- The applicant is responsible for obtaining the public-body input needed for a high-quality application.
- Who usually leads engagement after acceptance?
- PEDW usually leads further engagement on the submitted documents, while applicants continue direct discussion of unresolved earlier matters.
- Can a public body raise a new issue later?
- Yes, where it has substantive reasons; it must explain why the issue was not raised before submission.
- Does advice come without charge?
- Not necessarily. Public-body advice may be subject to full cost recovery, and applicants should discuss fees early.
Stay in the loop
Keep Mark and Focus in view
Hear about future publications, announcements, and relevant updates from Mark and Focus.